Writings

Writings: Christianity

The New Testament was passed on by word of mouth and in writing, then copied by hand. By one 2016 count, some 5,500 Greek manuscripts survive. The oldest is widely regarded as a papyrus scrap of John from the second century or later, and the oldest complete Greek New Testament is from the fourth century CE or soon after.

Last reviewed:

The entries

  1. Codex Sinaiticus

    Codex. Copy made: 2nd to 3rd quarter of the 4th century CE.

  2. Codex Vaticanus

    Codex. Copy made: 4th century CE.

  3. Papyrus 52

    Papyrus. Copy made: 100 to 150 CE as first given by Colin Roberts.

  4. Papyrus 46

    Papyrus. Copy made: about 200 CE.

  5. Papyrus 66

    Papyrus. Copy made: about 200 CE as usually given, with published dates running from the early 2nd to the 4th century CE.

  6. Papyrus 75

    Papyrus. Copy made: 175 to 225 CE as long used.

  7. Papyrus 45

    Papyrus. Copy made: 3rd century CE as usually given.

  8. The Didache Codex

    Codex. Copy made: June 11, 1056 CE, as the scribe's closing note gives it.

  9. The Muratorian Fragment

    Manuscript. Copy made: eighth century CE, or possibly the seventh.

  10. The Dura-Europos Gospel harmony

    Manuscript. Copy made: no later than 256 or 257 CE.

How were the New Testament's books handed down?

They were passed on by word of mouth and in writing, then copied by hand. Catholic teaching holds that the apostles preached first, and that they and apostolic men later wrote the Gospels.1 The Orthodox Church in America holds that the Bible was produced in the Church, by and for the Church.2 Dale Martin of Yale also puts oral tradition first, then Paul's letters, then the Gospels. The Catholic and Orthodox statements and Martin differ on who wrote the Gospels.314 The Hebrew Bible, whose books Christians read as their Old Testament, is listed under Judaism.5

How much survives, and how old are the oldest copies?

By one 2016 count, some 5,500 Greek manuscripts survive. The early ones are often fragments, and about 6 percent date before about 800 CE.67 Copies of translations into Latin, Syriac, Coptic, Ethiopic, and other ancient languages also survive, but none of the ten entries is a Syriac, Coptic, Ethiopic, or Armenian copy.68

  • The tradition's account. Catholic teaching holds that the Gospels are of apostolic origin. The Orthodox Church in America's catechism names the four evangelists as their writers and dates Matthew, Mark, and Luke to the beginning of the second half of the first century and John near its close. The evangelical Chicago Statement, which speaks of scripture in general, rejects source study that leads to rejecting a book's stated authorship, and the Reformed Westminster Confession lists the Gospels according to Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John among the books of scripture. The Catholic, evangelical, and Reformed statements give no year, but the Catholic bishops' study Bible says tradition places Mark shortly before 70 CE.149101112
  • The critical dating. Martin dates 1 Thessalonians, the earliest New Testament writing, probably to about 50 CE, and Mark probably to about 70 CE.3 The same study Bible, whose introduction to John applies critical analysis, says John was probably written in the 90s CE.13
  • The oldest copy and the gap. Papyrus 52, a scrap of John 18 widely regarded as the earliest portion of any New Testament writing found, was dated to 100 to 150 CE by handwriting. The John Rylands Library says newer research points nearer 200 CE, and Brent Nongbri argues for a range into the third century.714 Dale Martin of Yale places John maybe a year in the 90s CE,15 the Catholic bishops' study Bible places it probably in the 90s CE,13 and the Orthodox Church in America's catechism places it near the close of the first century.9 The gap is therefore about the same on all three: no more than about 60 years on the first editor's date, or about 100 years if the copy is nearer 200 CE.
  • The oldest complete copy. Codex Sinaiticus, the only complete Greek New Testament from before the ninth century, is dated 325 to 374 CE by the British Library, and Nongbri argues the range should widen to early fourth to early fifth century if one scribe wrote its marginal notes.161718 Mark, at about 70 CE on the critical dating and shortly before 70 CE in the Catholic bishops' study Bible, is about 255 to 305 years earlier than the library's dates. The Orthodox Church in America dates Mark to the beginning of the second half of the first century.

How should the entries be read?

Equal slots do not mean equal evidence. The copies differ in age, dating method, and what is known of where they were found.

J. K. Elliott wrote in 2010 that experts generally agree Papyrus 52 was written by the mid-second century. Brent Nongbri argued in 2020 that its usual date, about 125 CE, rests entirely on handwriting.1414 Mark Letteney, reviewing Nongbri's book, says the record of where the papyri that dealers sold to the Beatty, Michigan, and Freer collections were found is almost certainly lost.19 For the methods, see how ancient texts are dated.

Sources

  1. Second Vatican Council. Dei Verbum, Dogmatic Constitution on Divine Revelation. Holy See, 1965, sections 9, 10, 11, 18, 19, and 22. Accessed 2026-10-28.
  2. Thomas Hopko. The Orthodox Faith, Volume I: Doctrine and Scripture, The Bible: Interpretation. Orthodox Church in America. Accessed 2026-10-28.
  3. Dale B. Martin. Introduction to New Testament History and Literature (RLST 152), Lecture 2: From Stories to Canon. Open Yale Courses, Yale University, transcript. Accessed 2026-10-28.
  4. Thomas Hopko. The Orthodox Faith, Volume I: Doctrine and Scripture, Sources of Christian Doctrine: Bible. Orthodox Church in America. Accessed 2026-10-28.
  5. Christine Hayes. Introduction to the Old Testament (Hebrew Bible) (RLST 145), Lecture 1: The Parts of the Whole. Open Yale Courses, Yale University, transcript. Accessed 2026-10-28.
  6. Eldon J. Epp. Critical editions of the New Testament, and the development of text-critical methods: From Erasmus to Griesbach (1516-1807), chapter 5 of The New Cambridge History of the Bible, volume 3 (ed. Euan Cameron). Cambridge University Press, 2016, pp. 110 to 137; the opening summary on the publisher's page. Accessed 2026-11-05.
  7. The University of Manchester Library. Fragment of the Gospel of John, Greek P 457 (the St John Fragment, P52), record on Manchester Digital Collections. The John Rylands Library, The University of Manchester, record. Accessed 2026-11-05.
  8. Ethiopian Heritage Fund. The Garima Gospels. Ethiopian Heritage Fund (a charity that conserves Ethiopian manuscripts), project page. Accessed 2026-11-05.
  9. Thomas Hopko. The Orthodox Faith, Volume I: Doctrine and Scripture, New Testament: Gospels. Orthodox Church in America, opening sections and the sections on Luke and John. Accessed 2026-11-05.
  10. International Council on Biblical Inerrancy. The Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy. Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals, summary statement, Articles XII and XVIII. Accessed 2026-10-28.
  11. Westminster Assembly. The Westminster Confession of Faith. The Orthodox Presbyterian Church, chapter 1. Accessed 2026-10-28.
  12. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. New American Bible, Revised Edition: Introduction to the Gospel according to Mark. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, introduction. Accessed 2026-11-05.
  13. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. New American Bible, Revised Edition: Introduction to the Gospel according to John. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, introduction. Accessed 2026-11-05.
  14. Brent Nongbri. Palaeography, Precision and Publicity: Further Thoughts on P.Ryl.iii.457 (P52). New Testament Studies 66.4 (2020), Cambridge University Press, 2020, pp. 471 to 499, abstract. Accessed 2026-11-05.
  15. Dale B. Martin. Introduction to New Testament History and Literature (RLST 152), Lecture 12: Johannine Christianity: the Letters. Open Yale Courses, Yale University, transcript. Accessed 2026-11-05.
  16. Smithsonian Institution (Freer Gallery of Art and Arthur M. Sackler Gallery Archives). Codex Sinaiticus, exhibition page. Smithsonian Institution, record. Accessed 2026-11-05.
  17. British Library. Add MS 43725: Codex Sinaiticus, Bible in two volumes, catalogue record. British Library Archives and Manuscripts Catalogue, record. Accessed 2026-11-05.
  18. Brent Nongbri. A New Article on the Date of Codex Sinaiticus. The Early History of the Codex (blog by Brent Nongbri), 2022, blog post of August 3, 2022. Accessed 2026-11-05.
  19. Mark Letteney. Review of Brent Nongbri, God's Library: The Archaeology of the Earliest Christian Manuscripts (Yale University Press, 2018). Journal of Late Antiquity 12.2 (2019), Johns Hopkins University Press, 2019, pp. 550 to 562. Accessed 2026-11-05.